In a recent meal with a group of church friends, we shared the most beautiful places we had visited in our lives. Pictures of Yellowstone National Park, Sicily, Prague, and the New England coastline flashed through my mind, but one image that kept returning was the city of Hong Kong. The city skyline in front of a backdrop of green mountains as the sun sets over the water of the Pacific Ocean is hard to beat.
I grew up in a southern Chinese city named Guangzhou, roughly two hours north of Hong Kong by train. We speak the same dialect, we sing the same pop songs, and we watch the same shows as those in Hong Kong, so I’m accustomed to calling the city my second home.
One childhood memory adds to my fascination with Hong Kong. In the middle of the 6:30 evening news from Hong Kong, our TV in mainland China would suddenly (and frequently) switch to a color screen for 5-10 minutes, and then everything would return to normal. Or during a special news report, our television would show scenes of birds flying over nature. My parents would react by saying, “Ahh, they are talking about something that we can’t hear again.” My 10-year-old brain didn’t understand why certain things could be considered off-limits for those of us living in China, but that was my first experience of censorship.
After I immigrated to the United States and became familiar with the variety of political opinions and worldviews, I became more aware of the danger of censorship. What the audience is deprived of is not simply information on certain sensitive topics, but they are stripped of entire categories of vocabulary with which to process information. In other words, what people are denied is not just access to new information, but they are also deprived of different frameworks with which they can make sense of the information that they already have.
An Intersection of East and West
Hong Kong is such a fascinating place because of the intersection of Eastern and Western ideas and cultures. The 99 years that Hong Kong was under British rule – commonly regarded as a source of shame by the people of China – gave the people in Hong Kong access to ideas and worldviews that most people in mainland China did not have.
But this is also what has made Hong Kong such a dangerous place in recent decades in the eyes of the Chinese government. Under the agreement of “One Nation, Two Systems,” which was created after the British returned Hong Kong to China, Hong Kong is given a degree of autonomy and freedom that the people in China do not have for 50 years.
As travel between the mainland and Hong Kong became much easier in the early 2000s, it not only promoted a greater exchange of commercial goods but also a greater exchange of ideas between China and Hong Kong.The people – and house churches – from China suddenly had access to knowledge that they did not possess before. As Pastor Wang Yi once prayed, Hong Kong became a refuge for the churches in China, in which mainland Chinese pastors and believers could meet and gather together for training and prayer.
All of this did not go unnoticed by the central Chinese government. Since its return to China in 1997, Hong Kong has noticed a gradual erosion of its freedom and autonomy under the rule of the Chinese government. The Extradition Bill was another big step in this unwelcomed trend, but even without the bill, this erosion seems to be an irreversible process that the people of Hong Kong have to reckon with. That could be a large part of why protests and unrest have not died down after the withdrawal of this bill. The people – especially young people – fear that Hong Kong will just become another Chinese city over time. When that happens, their access to social media will be limited, their actions will be monitored, and news outlets will be censored.
Over the last half of the year, we have already seen that the protests and unrest are depicted very differently by various news outlets in Hong Kong. There are worries that news stations and newspapers are beginning to take sides. There is a spin to everything. This is because the conflict is not just between the people in Hong Kong and the Central Government in Beijing, but it is also among different factions of Hong Kong society, each holding to its own position and struggling to acknowledge the veracity and concerns of the other side.
In a sense, censorship is already happening in Hong Kong, but it is a form of self-censorship because the various sides tend to interpret events in a way that supports their own positions. When the factions dig deeper and deeper into their own ideological positions, the possibility for a political compromise and peaceful resolution becomes less and less likely.
What Should the Church Do?
In such divisive times, the churches in Hong Kong have faced questions about their social, political, and moral responsibilities from within and without, and from these questions have come pressures from all sides. Some accuse the Christian leaders in Hong Kong of being advocates of violence because protests and rallies are often preceded by prayer gatherings. Some accuse Christians of obstructing justice because they place their bodies between the police and the protestors. Some accuse the church and church schools as vehicles of Western ideology. Some call on the church to condemn the violence and stop harboring protestors. Some call on the church to protest against the government because churches should speak out for the oppressed and they also stand to lose in the erosion of their freedom.
One thing is clear: Different factions either see the Christian churches as allies or as enemies; they either seek to solicit the churches’ support or to ensure the churches do not make things more complicated. Facing pressure from within and without, some church leaders struggle to come up with the best way to move forward.
The churches in Hong Kong are facing an unprecedented test, and it is becoming harder to discern how they are called to be a blessing to the city. But it is in this unprecedented time that churches can stand up to point people to the Gospel. Perhaps the way forward is not to please different sides of society or to form an alliance with the right faction. The way forward may lie in protecting the distinctiveness of being the church of Christ, and as such, being the scaffold of the heavenly Kingdom of God that is to come on earth.
The Church as a Witness to Another Kingdom
The church holds the best perspective to see all the events through the lens of eternity. This perspective is revealed from God through the Scriptures, and it cannot be censored. While public opinions can be swayed like a tree by the breeze of news report
s, Christians know where their eternal destiny lies — in a Kingdom that cannot be shaken rather than in the kingdoms of man. The church must hold a steady course to preach the Kingdom of God, both in season and out of season. It is only when finding rest in our true hope that men cease raging.
With the proclamation of the Truth, the churches should also tell the truth. Because our hope is in a heavenly King, we do not have to take sides to promote the success of an earthly king. Christians do not have to bend the truth to support or denigrate any factions of society. If different sides are only interested in a partial narrative that supports their own ideological position, the church’s calling is to seek to shed light on the full narrative. Whether it is pointing out the mistreatment of police officers or the violence against protesters, the church is a defender of truths, and as such, it should call out any injustice that is done to anyone.
Lastly, as the scaffold of the Kingdom and defender of truth, the church can be an agent of love and peace. Now entering the new year with more protests, peace seems like a distant memory and a fanciful dream. With the fabric of Hong Kong society devolving into factions, it is almost impossible to get anyone to listen to each other, not to mention love each other. But Christians bear the calling to love our neighbors as ourselves, including our enemies. That neighbor could be a protester or a police officer, black shirt or white shirt, blue ribbon or yellow ribbon. The door of the church is open to all who seek refuge within because Christ has broken down the dividing wall of hostility.
Ultimately, the church in Hong Kong can show the very real hope they have in Christ by living as people who are truly free (1 Peter 2:16). It is right and just for churches to speak out against unjust laws and defend freedom, but they will never have to do it from a place of desperation. They can perhaps learn from their brothers and sisters in the mainland, and from Pastor Wang Yi, who is now in prison for his faithfulness to the gospel. Even though individual rights can be violated and religious freedom can be limited, the church of Christ cannot be bound. The proclamation of the gospel may sound more distinct in the face of suffering because light shines brighter in the darkness.
And yet in the darkness, our brothers and sisters in China have not ceased to pray for the people who oppress them, share the gospel with the officials who arrest them, and love the neighbors who report on them. We give thanks to God for preserving the churches in Hong Kong over the last hundred years and for two decades of relative peace and freedom under Hong Kong’s autonomous status. The future of Hong Kong is uncertain, but it is clear that more unrest and violence will follow. But in the midst of all the rubble, may the scaffold of the Kingdom of God rise up to build a better city.
The original article can be found here.